APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Godswill Red>

    Wales VS Bosnia and Herzegovina

    FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA)
    Analysis More Tips
    Wales
    Wales
    Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Further Reading
    • Analysis VIP99
      Analysis VIP99 Won 7/11
      Match Analysis & Form • Wales (The Defensive Crisis): Under Craig Bellamy, Wales has been lethal in attack, recently demolishing North Macedonia 7–1. However, they enter this match with a "hammer blow" of defensive injuries. Captain Ben Davies (broken ankle), Chris Mepham (hamstring), and Connor Roberts are all officially out. This leaves a massive void in leadership and experience in the backline. • Bosnia-Herzegovina (The "Bogey Team"): Bosnia finished their group strongly, drawing 1–1 with group-winners Austria and defeating Romania 3–1. They are currently on a 4-match unbeaten run and have historically been a nightmare for Wales. In four previous meetings, Wales has never beaten Bosnia (0 wins, 2 draws, 2 losses). • The Experience Factor: While Wales relies on youthful energy (Harry Wilson, Brennan Johnson), Bosnia leans on the legendary Edin Džeko. Now 40 and playing for Schalke, Džeko remains a massive threat in the box, especially against a makeshift Welsh defense.
      AH
      WCPEU Wales - Bosnia and Herzegovina
    • Johnson Vincent
      Johnson Vincent
      Match Analysis This is a high-stakes, single-leg knockout match. The winner will advance to the play-off final on March 31 to face either Italy or Northern Ireland for a place at the 2026 World Cup. Wales' Home Strength: Under manager Craig Bellamy, Wales has built a strong home record, losing just twice in their last 14 matches at home (W8, D4). They enter this match with significant momentum following a 7–1 thrashing of North Macedonia in their final group game. Bosnia's Resilience: Bosnia is currently unbeaten in four matches (W2, D2) and missed out on automatic qualification by a narrow margin after a late draw with Austria. Historically, Bosnia has never lost to Wales in four previous meetings (W2, D2), keeping clean sheets in the last three. Predicted Score: Wales 2–1 Bosnia and Herzegovina Wales' attacking quality, led by the in-form Harry Wilson and Brennan Johnson, is expected to overcome a resilient Bosnian side in front of the "Red Wall" in Cardiff
      AH
      WCPEU Wales - Bosnia and Herzegovina
    • Richard Roger
      Richard Roger Won 3/4
      Wales WLLLWW Wales will want to continue from where they left off last time out with the 7-1 WC Qualifiers - Europe victory over North Macedonia. In that match, Wales managed 70% possession and 17 shots on goal with 9 of them on target. For Wales, the scorers were Harry Wilson (18', 75', 81'), David Brooks (21'), Brennan Johnson (37'), Daniel James (57') and Nathan Broadhead (88'). At the other end, North Macedonia had 6 attempts at goal with 2 on target. Bojan Miovski (23') was the scorer for North Macedonia. Bosnia WLDWWD In their last game, Bosnia drew 1-1 in the WC Qualifiers - Europe tie with Austria. In that match, Bosnia had 30% possession and 8 shots on goal with 1 on target. The scorer for Bosnia was Haris Tabaković (12'). On the other side, Austria got 10 attempts on goal with 3 on target. Michael Gregoritsch (77') was the scorer for Austria. 💡 Prediction We’re inclined to think that Bosnia will need to apply a lot of pr
      O/U
      WCPEU Wales - Bosnia and Herzegovina
    More Tips
    • Djibouti VS South Sudan Based on the comparison between the initial and real-time data, the victory seems to be in the bag. Djibouti has a higher offensive conversion rate (0.18) than South Sudan (0.12), and its xG efficiency (0.93/xG) is better than that of its opponent (0.81/xG). The key pass success rate of Djibouti reaches 47%, while South Sudan only has 31%. In terms of the value of forward passes, Djibouti creates 0.7 threatening opportunities every 30 minutes, compared to South Sudan's 0.3. In midfield control, Djibouti's ball possession rate of 58% suppresses South Sudan's 42%. Its transition speed (7.2 seconds from losing the ball to counter - attack) is 1.5 seconds faster. Djibouti runs 112 kilometers throughout the game, and the number of high - intensity sprints (38 times) is 12 more than that of South Sudan. I'm a professional analyst. Follow me and set up app notifications to receive daily recommendations and continuous surprises! In this African Cup encounter, let's ta
      AH
      CAF NC Djibouti - South Sudan
    • Turkey VS Romania In this European qualifier, a detailed analysis of the two teams' performance reveals interesting insights. Turkey has been involved in six qualifying matches. On average, they manage 2.8 key passes per game. However, their offensive conversion rate stands at only 9.7%, ranking eighth in the league. Their xG efficiency is 0.83, which is lower than the league average of 0.95. On the other hand, Romania shows strong offensive capabilities. The value of their forward passes reaches 14.2, ranking second in the European qualifiers. Their key pass success rate is 61.4%, 12 percentage points higher than their opponents. Their counter - attack speed is as high as 7.2 m/s, one of the fastest in the league. In terms of midfield transition, Romania is quicker. It takes them an average of 18.3 seconds to switch from defense to attack, 2.1 seconds faster than Turkey. Moreover, they have a 54% ball - possession rate in the attacking midfielder area, which gives them an edge over th
      AH
      WCPEU Turkey - Romania
    • Italy VS Northern Ireland When comparing the initial odds with the real - time data, the game shows some interesting insights. In terms of offensive efficiency, Italy had 16 offensive terminations in the whole game but only scored 1 goal, with an xG efficiency of 0.25, which is lower than Northern Ireland's 0.75. Regarding key passing success rates, Italy achieved 62% while Northern Ireland reached 83%. In the front - field passing, Northern Ireland created 0.4 high - threat passes every 30 seconds. The midfield transition speed of Northern Ireland is 5.8 meters per second, faster than Italy's 4.9 meters per second. The number of high - intensity sprints of the whole Northern Ireland team is 42 times, compared with Italy's 28 times, and their running distance is 1.2 kilometers more. Overall, based on these data, the situation seems to be in favor of Northern Ireland. I've been analyzing these games for a long time, and I believe these stats can offer valuable perspectives for this matc
      AH
      WCPEU Italy - Northern Ireland
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.